Regime-Switching Models for Time Series
A single model fitted across a recession and an expansion describes neither. Regime-switching models allow the dynamics themselves to change, with the regime inferred rather than assumed.
A single model fitted across a recession and an expansion describes neither. Regime-switching models allow the dynamics themselves to change, with the regime inferred rather than assumed.
The quantity you care about arrives quarterly and two months late. Related indicators arrive daily. Nowcasting is the problem of estimating the present from what has already been published.
A intervention happened at a known date and you need its effect. There is no control group, only the series itself before and after, and the counterfactual has to be constructed.
Forecasting processes accumulate steps: a statistical model, a planner override, a consensus meeting. Each is assumed to improve the number. FVA is how you find out.
A hierarchy does not have to be geographic. Aggregating a series over time produces the same coherence problem, and the same machinery solves it.
Label noise is one of the most damaging data quality problems in supervised learning because it corrupts the target the model is trained to imitate.
Neural forecasting has produced genuinely useful architectures and a great deal of noise. The differences between them are more interesting than their benchmark scores.
Daily incident counts are integers, non-negative, often small, and correlated with yesterday. ARIMA assumes none of that and Poisson regression assumes independence.
Standard practice offers two options: the series is stationary, or you difference it. Some series are genuinely in between, and forcing them either way loses information.
Two series can trace an identical shape while one runs slightly ahead of the other. Point-by-point distance calls them dissimilar; dynamic time warping does not.