In today’s data-driven world, we often rely on statistical correlations to make decisions. Whether it’s a business predicting customer behavior or a healthcare study analyzing the impact of a new drug, correlations offer a quick way to extract patterns from data. However, correlations can be misleading. The phrase “correlation does not imply causation” is well known, but understanding why this is true and how to move beyond correlation requires deeper insights into causality.

This article is aimed at anyone who works with data and is interested in gaining a more accurate understanding of how to interpret statistical relationships. Here, we will explore how to uncover causal relationships in data, how to resolve confusing situations like Simpson’s Paradox and Berkson’s Paradox, and how to use causal graphs as a tool for making better decisions. The goal is to demonstrate that by understanding causality, we can avoid the pitfalls of over-relying on correlation and make more informed decisions.

author_profile: false categories:

  • Statistics classes: wide date: ‘2020-01-01’ excerpt: Understand how causal reasoning helps us move beyond correlation, resolving paradoxes and leading to more accurate insights from data analysis. header: image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg og_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg show_overlay_excerpt: false teaser: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg keywords:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Causality
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science seo_description: Explore how causal reasoning, through paradoxes like Simpson’s and Berkson’s, can help us avoid the common pitfalls of interpreting data solely based on correlation. seo_title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Understanding Paradoxes and Causal Graphs’ seo_type: article summary: An in-depth exploration of the limits of correlation in data interpretation, highlighting Simpson’s and Berkson’s paradoxes and introducing causal graphs as a tool for uncovering true causal relationships. tags:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science
  • Causal inference title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Simpson’’s and Berkson’’s Paradoxes’ —

The Importance of Causal Inference

Causal inference is the process of determining whether and how one variable causes changes in another. Randomized control trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for establishing causality because they randomly assign treatments to subjects, thus eliminating confounders and biases. However, RCTs can be expensive, time-consuming, and sometimes unethical or impractical to conduct.

In most real-world scenarios, we rely on observational data, which is data collected without manipulating any variables. The challenge with observational data is that it’s difficult to establish causality because we can’t control for all the confounding factors that might be influencing the relationship.

Fortunately, researchers have developed methods to uncover causal relationships from observational data by combining statistical reasoning with a deep understanding of the data’s context. This is where causal graphs and tools like Simpson’s Paradox and Berkson’s Paradox come into play.

author_profile: false categories:

  • Statistics classes: wide date: ‘2020-01-01’ excerpt: Understand how causal reasoning helps us move beyond correlation, resolving paradoxes and leading to more accurate insights from data analysis. header: image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg og_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg show_overlay_excerpt: false teaser: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg keywords:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Causality
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science seo_description: Explore how causal reasoning, through paradoxes like Simpson’s and Berkson’s, can help us avoid the common pitfalls of interpreting data solely based on correlation. seo_title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Understanding Paradoxes and Causal Graphs’ seo_type: article summary: An in-depth exploration of the limits of correlation in data interpretation, highlighting Simpson’s and Berkson’s paradoxes and introducing causal graphs as a tool for uncovering true causal relationships. tags:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science
  • Causal inference title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Simpson’’s and Berkson’’s Paradoxes’ —

Berkson’s Paradox: The Pitfall of Selection Bias

Berkson’s Paradox is another example of how data can mislead us, particularly when we focus on a subset of data and mistakenly infer relationships that don’t exist in the general population.

The Example of Talent and Attractiveness

Let’s say you’re studying two traits in the general population: talent and attractiveness. You find no significant correlation between the two traits—people’s talent levels seem independent of how attractive they are.

Now, suppose you focus on a particular subset of the population: celebrities. In this subset, you observe a negative correlation between talent and attractiveness—celebrities who are highly attractive tend to be less talented, and vice versa.

This is Berkson’s Paradox. The negative correlation exists in the subset (celebrities) because being a celebrity is contingent on having at least one of these traits—either being very attractive or very talented. If someone is extremely attractive, they might become a celebrity without much talent, and if they are very talented, they can achieve fame without being particularly attractive. However, this negative correlation does not exist in the general population.

The Problem of Selection Bias

Berkson’s Paradox illustrates the problem of selection bias—when we restrict our analysis to a specific subset of the population, we may inadvertently introduce spurious correlations that don’t exist in the full dataset. In this case, the act of selecting celebrities introduces a negative correlation between talent and attractiveness that doesn’t exist in the general population.

The key takeaway from Berkson’s Paradox is that we need to be careful about how we select data for analysis. If we focus only on a specific group without understanding how that group was selected, we can introduce misleading correlations.

author_profile: false categories:

  • Statistics classes: wide date: ‘2020-01-01’ excerpt: Understand how causal reasoning helps us move beyond correlation, resolving paradoxes and leading to more accurate insights from data analysis. header: image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg og_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg overlay_image: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg show_overlay_excerpt: false teaser: /assets/images/data_science_4.jpg twitter_image: /assets/images/data_science_1.jpg keywords:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Causality
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science seo_description: Explore how causal reasoning, through paradoxes like Simpson’s and Berkson’s, can help us avoid the common pitfalls of interpreting data solely based on correlation. seo_title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Understanding Paradoxes and Causal Graphs’ seo_type: article summary: An in-depth exploration of the limits of correlation in data interpretation, highlighting Simpson’s and Berkson’s paradoxes and introducing causal graphs as a tool for uncovering true causal relationships. tags:
  • Simpson’s paradox
  • Berkson’s paradox
  • Correlation
  • Data science
  • Causal inference title: ‘Causality Beyond Correlation: Simpson’’s and Berkson’’s Paradoxes’ —

The Broader Implications of Causality in Data Analysis

Simpson’s and Berkson’s Paradoxes serve as cautionary tales for anyone working with data. They highlight the importance of understanding the causal structure behind data and the potential pitfalls of relying solely on correlation.

By using tools like causal graphs and thinking critically about the relationships between variables, we can:

  • Identify and control for confounders to avoid drawing incorrect conclusions.
  • Recognize when selection bias is influencing our results, as in Berkson’s Paradox.
  • Understand when to intervene in the data collection process, such as designing experiments or deciding which variables to control for in observational studies.

The field of causal inference offers powerful tools for moving beyond correlation and gaining deeper insights into the data. It’s not enough to ask, “What is correlated?” We need to ask, “Why are these variables related?” By doing so, we can make more informed decisions and avoid common pitfalls in data interpretation.

Conclusion

The journey from correlation to causation is not always straightforward, but it is essential for anyone making data-driven decisions. Simpson’s Paradox and Berkson’s Paradox illustrate how easily data can mislead us when we don’t account for the full causal story behind the numbers. Through tools like causal graphs, we can visualize relationships between variables, uncover hidden biases, and make better, more accurate conclusions.

Understanding causality requires more than just statistical analysis—it demands a deeper engagement with the data, including recognizing confounders, colliders, and the true mechanisms that generate the patterns we observe. By asking “Why?” instead of just “What?”, we can elevate our analysis, avoid common misinterpretation, and ultimately make more informed decisions based on the true nature of relationships in data.

Further Reading

  • Judea Pearl’s “The Book of Why” offers a foundational introduction to causality and causal graphs.
  • “Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer” provides a more technical deep dive into causal inference methods.
  • The DoWhy library in Python is an excellent tool for implementing causal inference techniques in practice.

You may also enjoy